Bartlett's Blog

Andrew Bartlett has been active in politics for over 20 years, including as a Queensland Senator from 1997-2008. This blog started in 2004 and reflects his own views, independent of any political party or organisation.

Senate preference mayhem: 0.2% of the vote could be enough to win

This election sees a record number of parties contesting the Senate and a record number of candidates. Even people like me who enjoy filling in all the squares below the line on the Senate ballot paper might balk at having to fill in 82 squares (if you’re in Queensland), 102 (if you’re in NSW) or 97 (if you’re in Victoria). I tend to start with my top few, then go to the bottom with the ones I loathe the most and after a few back and forths, ideally it all meets neatly in the middle – if I mess it up and have to start all over again it could end up taking quite a long time. All of which means the likelihood of people just voting 1 above the line for their favourite party is greater than ever.

If you just vote 1 above the line, your preferences are distributed according to the Group Voting Ticket lodged by that party. The problem with doing that is that the preference flows often go in directions you wouldn’t expect. Many of the micro parties are swapping preferences with each other regardless of whether their policies or philosophies are alike or deeply opposed.

There has been some attention drawn to examples such as the Wikileaks Party preferencing a white supremacist party and the Shooters Party ahead of the Greens in NSW and preferencing the Nationals in WA ahead of Wikileaks greatest Parliamentary supporter, Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, as well as the Sex Party in NSW preferencing Pauline Hanson ahead of the Greens. But these are just the tip of a very opaque iceberg. If you want to see who all the candidates are and where all of their preferences go, head to the Australian Electoral Commission’s website at this link –

With so many parties cross-preferencing, there is a real chance that a party will get someone elected on as little as 0.5% or even less – which would make Family First’s win in Victoria in 2004 with 1.9% look like a landslide.

To test out possible results, have a go at Antony Greens’ excellent Senate calculator at this link –

I’ve managed to get plausible primary vote scenarios where a party can get elected on 0.2% of the vote – which is what the Outdoor Recreation Party polled in winning a seat in the infamous ‘tablecloth ballot paper’ in the Upper House for the NSW state election in 1999. That election had 80 parties contesting, but the quota to win a seat was only 4.5%, compared to 14.3% for a Senate seat.

Significant reforms were made to the NSW Upper House voting system after the 1999 result, and even if we can avert such an anti-democratic result in the Senate contests this time, I’d suggest similar reforms to the Senate voting system are still very much needed.


No Comments, Comment or Ping

Reply to “Senate preference mayhem: 0.2% of the vote could be enough to win”

Mini Posts

  • Rhetoric vs reality

    I’ve had a break from writing for a variety of reasons, but the reckless approach the new Queensland government is taking to their spending decisions – and the straightout nonsensicality of some of their claims – roused me enough to pen a piece for New Matilda. Time will tell whether the Newman government will start trying to ensure their statements have some connection with reality – I suggest the way they respond next year to the findings of the inquiry into child safety which they’ve established will be a significant test.

  • End of LP the end of a blogging era

    Back in October, I wrote here about the decline or re-defining of blogs, at least in the Australian political arena.  The relatively few posts I’ve done on this blog since then shows how much less useful I find it to do my own blog than I used to, and as I mentioned back then, a big reason why I don’t read many of the blogs I used to is because the valuable links to many interesting stories, ideas and pieces of information can be found more easily through Twitter or Facebook, sometimes with comment threads which are also at least as good.

    The recent announcement by the Larvatus Prodeo blog that they are ceasing to operate is quite a significant one. (more…)

  • A final comment on Labor’s leadership laments

    Fundamentally, I don’t greatly care about the outcome of Labor’s leadership travails. As my previous post indicates, the bigger issue is that the ALP is being fundamentally damaged by the toxicity of this brawl, and the fact that the brawl is happening in this way is a sign of some much greater problems within Labor. Whatever the immediate outcome, I think those problems are likely to continue.  The outcome of the leadership contest (including the size of what will surely be a Gillard victory) will shape how those problems play out, but they will still be there.

    Not surprisingly, I see this as presenting an opportunity for the Greens to build some support, but more importantly it presets extra responsibility and obligation for the Greens to be a stronger counter to what is a seriously reactionary Coalition.

    But seeing we’re all pundits now, and despite having little inside knowledge, my prediction is that there will be no ‘third candidate’ in tomorrow’s leadership ballot.  Julia Gillard will win comfortably. The instability will not disappear. It’s quite possible there will be another leadership ballot before the election but Kevin Rudd will not become leader then either. No matter how good Kevin Rudd looks in the polls, that polling lead would disappear very quickly if he was back in the PM’s job.

  • The Ups & Downs of Ups & Downs – interview with Greg Atkinson

    I’ve mentioned before my liking for the 80s Brisbane band Ups and Downs. I got a chance to interview their lead singer Greg Atkinson on 4ZzZ FM a few weeks ago. They’ve released a compilation CD of 20 of their best tunes and played a gig in Brisbane earlier this month to promote and celebrate it.

    It was a fairly long interview, but I found it very interesting to hear the views of someone who has been active in the independent sphere of the music industry for so long about what has changed and what is the same.

    You can listen to the interview at this link.

  • Speeches to refugee rally + SIEV-X exhibition

    A local activist helpfully recorded speeches given by myself and by Julian Burnside at a refugee rights rally held in Brisbane last Saturday.  You can listen to them here and here. The rally was held to mark the tenth anniversary of the sinking of the SIEV-X.  353 refugees drowned when that refugee boat sank on the way to Australia on 19 October 2001.  There is a beautiful exhibition at The Studio on the ground level at the State Library of Qld this week, commemorating that anniversary. It finishes this weekend – I strongly recommend you try to get along for a look if you have a chance. The Library also has a screening of the documentary Hope on Friday October 28 – this film tell the story of Amal Basry, one of the few survivors of that tragedy.