Bartlett's Blog

Andrew Bartlett has been active in politics for over 20 years, including as a Queensland Senator from 1997-2008. This blog started in 2004 and reflects his own views, independent of any political party or organisation.

It was 20 years ago today.

It was 20 years ago today.
On 20 November 1989, the international Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC) was formally adopted.  According http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/11/18/us-ratify-children-s-treaty?tr=y&auid=5614841 to Human Rights Watch, the Convention became “the most widely and rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history.  Twenty years on, only two countries have failed to ratify the Convention – Somalia and the USA.
In the USA, Presidential action to ratify an international treaty requires the approval of the Senate.  I think this is a good mechanism and one Australia should adopt, even though it would undoubtedly be frustrating from time to time.  But regardless of the distractions of health care reform and climate change legislation, this is one action the USA’s President and Senate should get moving on.

On 20 November 1989, the international Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC) was formally adopted.  According to Human Rights Watch, the Convention became “the most widely and rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history.  Twenty years on, only two countries have failed to ratify the Convention – Somalia and the USA.

Somalia currently has no recognised government, which makes it impossible for it to ratify the CROC.  In the USA, Presidential action to ratify an international treaty requires the approval of the Senate.  I think this is a good mechanism and one Australia should adopt, even though it would undoubtedly be frustrating from time to time.  But regardless of the distractions of health care reform and climate change legislation, this is one action the USA’s President and Senate should get moving on.

Advertisement

4 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. TerjeP (say tay-a)

    What aspect of the convention do you think is vital for the USA?

  2. paul walter

    Taya, that is the fascistic thing I’ve ever seen written at a blog site!

  3. I recently heard a question asked of someone close to the Obama Presidency re signing this Convention, and the response was, ‘yes, they’ll sign that after they’ve signed the Convention on the rights and treatment of women????????So much for the ‘world’s biggest democracy’? Funny how they haven’t castigated Karzai for his oppressive and revolting legislation, giving men the right to demand sex, and withold food etc if it’s not forthcoming. The US is only interested in human rights that don’t get in the road of their ‘needs’? Such as the use or torture, the PATRIOT Act, the murder of citizens by the CIA in any or all countries it desires to, and the recent support for the overthrow of the democratically elected President of Honduras – the one preceeding the recent ‘elections’ I mean! Sick bastards, the lot of them!

  4. Lorikeet

    I don’t think it matters too much who ratifies what, if the people end up taking the bull by the tail, instead of by the horns. I find this happens a lot when there is money involved.

    Naomi:

    I’m fairly appalled by the way in which Australians do not come to the defence of anyone. They have yellow stripes running up their backs, and are purely self-interested.

Reply to “It was 20 years ago today.”

Mini Posts

  • Radio chat on the election

    Every Monday morning during my radio show on community radio 4ZzZ FM, I chat with Peter Black, a constitutional lawyer, follower of social and political issues and obsessive user of social media. I don’t normally put links to those chats on this blog, but given that our talk this morning was all about the federal election, I thought it was worth putting a link to it on this occasion. You can have a listen to it by clicking on this link.

    (0)
  • Pre-election 'Debate' Farce

    Given I am now running as a Greens candidate, I suppose it is no surprise that I am indicating my agreement with a comment that Bob Brown made today.  But I would also say that it isn’t any secret that I haven’t agreed with every public comment that Bob has made, and I would agree with the following comment about the schoolyard level nonsense regarding another possible leaders debate even if it had been made by Steve Fielding:

    What we’re seeing now between the two leaders is an absolute farce and people everywhere are rolling their eyes at Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard not having the maturity to get together to agree to the series of debates which would have enlightened the electorate,
    It is a joke and a sad reflection on the optic and image driven nature of political media coverage in Australia. A couple of weeks ago, there was a three way debate at the National Press Club on important ICT issues such as internet filtering, broadband and wider communications policy.

    More... (6)
  • Mountains of Coal

    A couple of years ago I wrote a blog post about mountaintop mining in the USA. All mining has some impact, but the sheer destructiveness of this type of mining is astonishing – and that’s before you take into account the greenhouse impact of the coal. This article in the New York Times details the potential impact of a similar project in West Virginia. The significance of this proposal is that there is the possibility it may be stopped, or seriously curtailed, by the Obama administration, which would be a signal of a positive shift on this issue.

    (2)
  • Recent Interviews

    Following are links to a couple of recent radio interviews I’ve done, plus an online one

    More... (1)
  • Piece on The Drum about challenges ahead for the Greens

    As I noted in my previous post, this week’s Newspoll saw the Greens register 16% support – the highest that party has ever achieved, comparable to the Democrats best Newspoll result of 17% back in 1990. History suggests it is unlikely that this peak will be maintained right through to election day (or even the next Newspoll) but it is part of a continuing trend of solid Greens results. I’ve written a piece expanding on this, and how the party might approach the challenges ahead, at The Drum/Unleashed on the ABC’s site – which you can read by clicking on this link.

    (0)
  • Wild Rivers

    Contention over Queensland’s  Wild Rivers legislation has been bubbling along for quite a while now. Unfortunately, as with many issues which become polarised, each “side” is focused on defending their position, which has meant that some important underlying issues are not getting the attention they deserve. I’ve just had a piece on this topic published at The Drum on the ABC’s website.  It’s fairly long, so they published it in two parts – the first part is at this link and the second part is at this one.  I should emphasise that the article reflects my personal views, and is not a formal view of the Greens, nor of ANTaR Queensland, who I am also involved with.

    (18)
  • Listen in to Choose Mics

    Hip hop fans in Brisbane might be interested in tuning in to my radio show on 4ZZZ FM this Monday morning around 7:30am. I’ll be talking with the Gold Coast based duo Choose Mics, who are launching their debut full length album Beggars Can’t Be Choosers at the Step Inn in the Valley this coming Friday night as part of what will be a big night for fans of hip-hop/rap/urban sounds, with Brisbane’s The Optimen also launching their second album “The Out of Money Experience” as part of the same event. Even though there is a steady stream of musical offerings in Brisbane, a double album launch of this magnitude doesn’t come along every day of the week, so I’ll dedicate a half hour or so to exploring not just the words and sounds of Choose Mics, but getting a broader overview from them of the hip hop related scenes locally and nationally.

    More... (2)