This line from David Marr is one of the best descriptions I’ve ever read of the farcical sound and fury which is Question Time in the House of Representatives:
It’s a bit like an RSPCA pound: never free of the spectre of being put down, the dogs bark and howl to attract attention.
()
For those interested in basic facts about temperature trends in Australia and globally over recent decades, there is a great post over at Lavartus Prodeo by Brian Banisch, who has been following the data and the various scientific reports on this issue for a long time. Very much worth having a read of for those who are just wanting some facts.
()
Items on Indian students, refugees in our region and Copenhagen
Below are links to some recent pieces I have written on other sites:
- some impacts from the recent http://asiancorrespondent.com/andrew-bartlett-blog/tragic-murder-puts-spotlight-back-on-safety-of-indians-in-australia murder of an Indian man living in Melbourne;
- connections between http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2009/12/19/another-failed-summit/ the failures of a UN Summit on hunger and the Copenhagen climate change summit.
- articles detailing some more mistreatment of refugees in our region here http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2009/12/29/more-refugee-torment-in-our-region/ and here http://asiancorrespondent.com/andrew-bartlett-blog/dangers-for-refugees-in-region-highlighted-by-forced-deportation-from-thailand
Below are links to some recent pieces I have written on other sites More... ()
Many not for profit and charity groups have got a lot smarter over the years in tapping into some of the large amounts of money that get spent over Christmas. Christmas catalogues full of gifts for good cause groups have become widespread. In recent times, that has extended to bypassing a present all together, and giving someone a donation which actually goes direct to the good cause.
This form of fundraising is now also tapping into social media, so much so that even my humble blog gets occasional requests to promote a cause from people who specifically target the avenues of social media to widen their reach.
Here’s one example I recently received on behalf of World Vision.
More... ()
I’ve posted a piece over at The Stump about the links between global hunger and climate change, and the unfortunate parallels between the less than successful climate change summit in Copenhagen and an even more dismal outcome at the recent Hunger Summit in Rome, which received far less attention.
()
It was 20 years ago today.
On 20 November 1989, the international Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC) was formally adopted. According http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/11/18/us-ratify-children-s-treaty?tr=y&auid=5614841 to Human Rights Watch, the Convention became “the most widely and rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history. Twenty years on, only two countries have failed to ratify the Convention – Somalia and the USA.
In the USA, Presidential action to ratify an international treaty requires the approval of the Senate. I think this is a good mechanism and one Australia should adopt, even though it would undoubtedly be frustrating from time to time. But regardless of the distractions of health care reform and climate change legislation, this is one action the USA’s President and Senate should get moving on.
On 20 November 1989, the international Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC) was formally adopted. According to Human Rights Watch, the Convention became “the most widely and rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history. Twenty years on, only two countries have failed to ratify the Convention – Somalia and the USA.
Somalia currently has no recognised government, which makes it impossible for it to ratify the CROC. In the USA, Presidential action to ratify an international treaty requires the approval of the Senate. I think this is a good mechanism and one Australia should adopt, even though it would undoubtedly be frustrating from time to time. But regardless of the distractions of health care reform and climate change legislation, this is one action the USA’s President and Senate should get moving on. ()
Following are links to some items I’ve had published on other sites
More... ()
14 Comments, Comment or Ping
GZG
Peter Garrett has acted to protect the “world’s most dangerous bird“, the disemboweling & bone breaking cassowary!
Good to see the honorable Minister for Plastic Bags finally “seriously and unusually” achieving something by “ruling a development out completely“.
Now if we could just get some runs on the board for his chairman captain.
For interested readers, here’s a local cassowary recipe that I believe would be popular with ex WW2 diggers who were warned (to no avail) to beware of these birds.
(All in good fun as I’m sure there will be many a concerned cassowary lover both here, and within the Minister’s constituency).
Jul 29th, 2008
LORIKEET
Can’t the cassowary and the people find a way of sharing territory?
Jul 29th, 2008
muzzmonster
So GZG, because the bird can be dangerous means it shouldn’t be protected?
Does that mean we (as humanity) should not protect the hippopotamus – well known to be dangerous?
Jul 29th, 2008
GZG
Lighten up Muzzmonster! No need to be so feral about matters pertaining to animals.
I did say “all in good fun” but having said that, I’ve no particular desire to see all dangerous animals wiped out (but will happily kill any wasp at home, in a nervous sort of way).
Not intending to apply the following just forged alliance to the sacred cassowary, being one of “we humanity”, I’m on the side of “people houses” rather than “hippo homes” or “Wallum Sedge Frog ponds”.
Jul 29th, 2008
muzzmonster
Sorry if I took your post too seriously GZG. Am getting fed up with people on blogs making seemingly silly comments
.
Jul 29th, 2008
liz gallie
The ministers decision has united a shell shocked community as local residents have watched in horror the bulldozers’ wake of destruction on essential cassowary habitat pushing the endangered casssowary even closer to extinction. A new amalgamated council and federal environmnet minister is giving the Mission Beach community hope that developers will no longer do as they will with this special place. We just hope it is not to late.
Aug 3rd, 2008
Dr F. Abacus
GZG – but seriously, in all likelihood there are fewer than 1000 cassawories left in Australia.
This is a little outside my arenas of expertise, but my understanding is that the cassawory is a specialist disperser of quite a few rainforest plants. And that at least some of those plants will not germinate unless their seeds have passed through the gut of a cassawory. Hence, fewer cassawories equates to a change in the composition of Australian tropical rainforests.
Essentially, if the cassawory beomes very rare or extinct in Australia, the nature of our tropical rainforests will change, and those changes are more than likely to be adverse.
Aug 3rd, 2008
ken
The shell shocked residents are, I would suspect more interested in preserving their idyllic lifestyle than the cassowary, and I say why not – good luck to them.
Oct 2nd, 2008
LORIKEET
Ken:
I’ve never read a comment so unbirdworthy.
Surely the cassowary is entitled to at least a portion of the rainforest, but I don’t think I’d like to cross beaks with it, if what GZG says is true.
As for the recipe, there were only signs revealing life and death, which didn’t seem too tasty to me.
Oct 5th, 2008
philip travers
I read recently,I think New Scientist, that the Chinese are building huts for Pandas,and the problem of falling populations was more dependent on a sheltered place to give birth than the bamboo type.Obviously, the Pandas must be using their eyesight as well as other senses to find suitable accommodation.Applying what ever can be garnered as common sense protection of a species like the Cassowary ,surely must be about how these birds perceive realities including human matters around them.You cannot really work from the other end effectively.That is decide this and that is their territory when, in fact, what is known about the sensing of the environment by the bird seems very limited..or not applied in an accurate way.With other birds attacking their own reflections off glass windows,etc., one could hope for intelligent pattern designs,or whatever,as a means similar to traffic signs for humans.That may not seem a valid approach, until by experiment .But ,it maybe , an adequate approach,if it keeps birds and humans etc. out of harms way.Locals could be paid for their observations and concern,in a spirit of scientific understanding.
Jul 27th, 2009
liz gallie
An update on the situation at Mission Beach and the dire situation facing the cassowary population. I worked as the submission writer for the local conservation group C4, http://www.cassowaryconservation.asn.au on the Lot 66 development proposal which Peter Garrett deemed ‘clearly unacceptable’ last year. The developers have reapplied with an altered plan which is equally unnacceptable in the only robust corridor that gives reasonably unhindered movement to the large block of coastal lowland rainforest for the known cassowary family relying on the habitat for their survival.
This development must not go ahead and we will be lobbying hard for the Minister to make a firm committment to the cassowaries at Mission Beach. We are asking for a buy back of this block. The development proposal has just been posted on the Federal Environment referrals webpage and is open for comment for 10 working days from today. Please follow the link and let the Environment Department know that this block needs to be secured in perpetuity by the Federal Government and clearing of any essential cassowary habitat at Mission Beach must stop now before it is too late. . The cassowaries at Mission Beach need all the help you can give them.
Please pass this on to as many people as you can.
http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/epbc/epbc_ap.pl?name=referral_detail&proposal_id=5051
Aug 24th, 2009
liz gallie
Mr Garrett has decided to assess the new development application under the EPBC Act as a ‘Controlled Action’ requiring a Public Environment Report. I am not sure about the ‘PER’ but to date the Controlled action process has not given Mission Beach an acceptable outcome in regard to any development approvals undere the Act. He could have said no to this one on the strength of the evidence against it and the proponents environmental record and shown his committment to cassowaries at Mission Beach. After all the work that has been done and been achieved for the environment at Mission Beach over the past 20 years by the local environment organisation C4 I am now beginning to despair for the future of our high biodiversity area. We have a Land Gift Fund for securing cassowary habitat in perpetuity. This is a plea for help to save the cassowary at Mission Beach. Please visit http://www.cassowaryconservation.asn.au
Oct 10th, 2009
Reply to “EPBC used to protect cassowary”