Bartlett's Blog

Andrew Bartlett has been active in politics for over 20 years, including as a Queensland Senator from 1997-2008. This blog started in 2004 and reflects his own views, independent of any political party or organisation.

The Speech

As the speech itself acknowledges, a single speech can't resolve things.  But it is impossible to overstate how significant it would be if the vision President Obama expresses and aspires to in this speech is successful.  The text of the speech is here, or here for translations into 14 other languages.  It is worth taking the time to listen to and watch as well.

Advertisement

An amazing and courageous editorial from the grave

The focus on Barack Obama as the person of the moment, and the politician that grabbed the globes imagination throughout 2008 caused me to reflect in this post on other politicians who overcame even higher odds at greater personal costs in 2008.  But it also important to continually remember that there are many other people around the world who show even greater perseverance and courage. Many of them ...

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty 40 years on

This week saw the fortieth anniversary of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). One thing that has often perplexed me is how much the public anxiety about the proliferation of nuclear and other armaments has diminished over the last twenty years. The end of the Cold War could explain some of it, but given the repeated references by various political leaders to the threat of terrorism, a ‘War on Terror’, rogue ...

Misuse of terror laws makes us all less secure

Yet again, a case which received a blaze of publicity over two years ago, adding to unrealistic fear and alarm about Muslims in Australia, has failed when it finally comes to trail - and providing Australia’s Muslims yet another reason to feel less secure and less trusting of our government and law enforcement agencies. Even more worryingly, the judge in the case condemned the conduct of ASIO officers as ...

Dr Haneef’s bail decision in Brisbane – court decision usurped by Ministerial fiat

Dr Mohammed Haneef was given bail this morning on a $10 000 surety, with a requirement he report to police 3 times a week and that he not leave the country. I attended the court for the handing down of the Magistrate’s decision. It should be noted that, had the federal government had their way, this man would be imprisoned for the duration of what could well be ...

Don’t be so Reckless – Terrorist sim cards and terrorist peace activists

News has come through that after being held in custody for nearly two weeks, Gold Coast based Doctor, Mohammed Hanef has now been charged. According to this report,“he has been charged with recklessly supplying a mobile phone sim card to a terrorist organisation.” The offence carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison (originally reported as 25 years). Of course, it will take a long time for the case against ...

The Security Treaty between Australia & Indonesia

Late last year, a security cooperation agreement between Australia and the Republic of Indonesia was signed on the Indonesian island of Lombok. As with all international agreements, this one, which has already picked up the colloquial title of the Lombok Agreement, is being examined by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. The Committee is still receiving submissions. You can read the ones which have been made public to ...

Terrorists score a big win against democratic values in the USA, while Australia’s Muslims are right to be anxious

The case of a Canadian citizen, Maher Arar, who was secretly sent by the USA government to Syria where he was “interrogated, tortured and held in degrading and inhumane conditions for 10 months after being falsely accused of terrorist ties” has not received a great deal of coverage in the Australian media. However, it is a fair bet that many Muslim Australians are very aware of this case. ...

US Senate Committee rebels – basic foundations of the rule of law hang in the balance

A follow up to my previous post about the review of sedition laws – as noted in one of the comments on that piece, some people see community concern about the sedition laws as just a beat-up by paranoid anti-government left-wingers. Whilst there's certainly been some exaggeration and misunderstanding about what the laws entail and how they could be applied, my key concern is the danger of embedding ...

Fighting Words from the Law Reform Commission

The debate about sedition laws was featured on my old blog in November last year. Readers may remember that the Senate Committee that examined the legislation recommended that the section updating sedition provisions be deleted from the latest 'anti-terror' laws being rushed through Parliament. The government didn't agree with that recommendation and used their Senate majority to ensure the law passed with the sedition provisions retained. ...

September 11 – 5 years on

There are retrospectives and introspectives all over the internet and the mainstream media marking the fifth anniversary of the attacks on New York’s World Trade Centre. The Open Democracy site has a good series of pieces asking a range of people the simple question – “what have we learned”?

Honour Bound

Last night I attended the formal premiere of a theatrical production called "Honour Bound", which deals with David Hicks' incarceration in Guantanamo Bay. The show is running for the next 5 weeks at the Sydney Opera House. The show was certainly interesting and thought-provoking. It goes for just over an hour, painting a picture through visuals, voiceovers and dance.

Sedition – then and now

I always find it interesting to discover historical debates that resonate – and often help illuminate – with the debates of today. I discovered an example of this in a fascinating piece in this week’s New York Times that gives an insight into the use of sedition laws in the past.

Flying? Don’t forget your bag – no joke

I mentioned the Regulations and Ordinances Committee once in an earlier post. This is one of the more low profile Senate Committees, which in some ways adds to its effectiveness. It looks at all the regulations and other disallowable instruments tabled by the government, of which there are more than 1500 each year. It examines the technical adequacy of Regulations and their adherence to basic principles such ...

Turning a Blind Eye to Torture? UPDATED

A report in the Sydney Morning Herald may finally increase the pressure on the Australian government about how willing it has been to turn a blind eye to the use of torture by our ally in the so-called ‘war on terror’.

Can I look at your Google?

Google searches, library requests, emails, SMS, car trips, voice messages, phone conversations, etc can all be mointored and recorded. Does it make us safer? There has been a lot of commentary (such as at Road to Surfdom, the Currency Lad and Larvatus Prodeo) on the recent revelation that US President George Bush authorised widespread secret surveillance and communications intercepts on US citizens (not to mention many others). ...

Guillotine brought in on Terror law after 90 minutes

The Senate started sitting at 12.30pm today, with debate starting on the terror legislation. The speakers list on the Bill circulated by the Government Whip's office had 28 Senators listed as wanting to speak. This initial list included 8 Liberal Senators. This is quite a large number of government Senators to speak on one Bill. The list also included all 8 Democrat and Green ...

Will there be just one day each to debate the welfare changes and the terror law?

The government has released their draft Senate legislation program for next week. It shows just one day – Monday - set aside for the debate on the terror legislation, with only the Tuesday to deal with the welfare changes. The final 3 sitting days have 15 other pieces of legislation listed, including the VSU Bill and the Northern Territory radioactive waste Bill.

Senate Committee reports – the good, the bad and the minority

The Senate Committee report into the terror law that was tabled today provides a very good example of how valuable it can be when a few government Senators show sufficient courage to actually admit to and point out significant flaws in a piece of legislation. On this occasion, the Government (and non-government) Senators recommended over 50 changes that should be made. Margot Kingston's site provides some good ...

Senate reports on terror and welfare laws tabled on Monday

This weekend I am working on my contribution to the Senate Committee report into the government's welfare changes, as well as examining the details of the planned Terror law. The Committee reports into the welfare package and the terror measures will both be tabled in the Senate on Monday afternoon (sometime after 3.30pm). These will give an insight into the potential for any further amendments to ...

Next,

Mini Posts

  • Question Time defined

    This line from David Marr is one of the best descriptions I’ve ever read of the farcical sound and fury which is Question Time in the House of Representatives:

    It’s a bit like an RSPCA pound: never free of the spectre of being put down, the dogs bark and howl to attract attention.

    (0)
  • Recent data on the climate

    For those interested in basic facts about temperature trends in Australia and globally over recent decades, there is a great post over at Lavartus Prodeo by Brian Banisch, who has been following the data and the various scientific reports on this issue for a long time. Very much worth having a read of for those who are just wanting some facts.

    (0)
  • Articles on Indian students, failed UN summits & refugees in our region

    Items on Indian students, refugees in our region and Copenhagen
    Below are links to some recent pieces I have written on other sites:
    - some impacts from the recent  http://asiancorrespondent.com/andrew-bartlett-blog/tragic-murder-puts-spotlight-back-on-safety-of-indians-in-australia murder of an Indian man living in Melbourne;
    - connections between http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2009/12/19/another-failed-summit/ the failures of a UN Summit on hunger and the Copenhagen climate change summit.
    - articles detailing some more mistreatment of refugees in our region here http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2009/12/29/more-refugee-torment-in-our-region/ and here http://asiancorrespondent.com/andrew-bartlett-blog/dangers-for-refugees-in-region-highlighted-by-forced-deportation-from-thailand
    Below are links to some recent pieces I have written on other sites

    More... (0)
  • Charities tapping into Christmas and social media

    Many not for profit and charity groups have got a lot smarter over the years in tapping into some of the large amounts of money that get spent over Christmas.  Christmas catalogues full of gifts for good cause groups have become widespread. In recent times, that has extended to bypassing a present all together, and giving someone a donation which actually goes direct to the good cause. This form of fundraising is now also tapping into social media, so much so that even my humble blog gets occasional requests to promote a cause from people who specifically target the avenues of social media to widen their reach. Here’s one example I recently received on behalf of World Vision. 

    More... (4)
  • The Hunger Summit

    I’ve posted a piece over at The Stump about the links between global hunger and climate change, and the unfortunate parallels between the less than successful climate change summit in Copenhagen and an even more dismal outcome at the recent Hunger Summit in Rome, which received far less attention.

    (0)
  • It was 20 years ago today.

    It was 20 years ago today.
    On 20 November 1989, the international Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC) was formally adopted.  According http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/11/18/us-ratify-children-s-treaty?tr=y&auid=5614841 to Human Rights Watch, the Convention became “the most widely and rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history.  Twenty years on, only two countries have failed to ratify the Convention – Somalia and the USA.
    In the USA, Presidential action to ratify an international treaty requires the approval of the Senate.  I think this is a good mechanism and one Australia should adopt, even though it would undoubtedly be frustrating from time to time.  But regardless of the distractions of health care reform and climate change legislation, this is one action the USA’s President and Senate should get moving on.
    On 20 November 1989, the international Convention on the Rights of the Child (CROC) was formally adopted.  According to Human Rights Watch, the Convention became “the most widely and rapidly ratified human rights treaty in history.  Twenty years on, only two countries have failed to ratify the Convention – Somalia and the USA. Somalia currently has no recognised government, which makes it impossible for it to ratify the CROC.  In the USA, Presidential action to ratify an international treaty requires the approval of the Senate.  I think this is a good mechanism and one Australia should adopt, even though it would undoubtedly be frustrating from time to time.  But regardless of the distractions of health care reform and climate change legislation, this is one action the USA’s President and Senate should get moving on.

    (4)
  • Pieces published elsewhere

    Following are links to some items I’ve had published on other sites

    More... (0)